On the Reading of Old Books

I think C.S. Lewis wrote an essay with that title once. So I decided to borrow it.

____

I was thinking, the other day, about the Classics. You all make your children read them during the school year, and maybe even over the summer. And I bet you’ve all heard some complaint to the effect of, “Why do we have to read this book? What’s so important about it?”

Where I teach philosophy, we are very much “into” the Classics.  We teach the Classic Philosophical Texts. That is our approach to teaching philosophy.

Other schools might focus on Classic Philosophical Problems, or Recent Philosophical Problems, or Contemporary Questions in Philosophy, or Historical Debates in Philosophy. And we do that too. It’s just our specialty is in teaching the Classic Texts.

____

But why focus on classic books?  What do you tell your children?

Here’s some of my thoughts on the subject:

____

The classics are, for the most part, very old, and very well-known. They’ve been popular for a very long time, in other words, and have been read by many, many historically-important people

When you sit down to read a classic book, therefore, you’re doing the same thing that countless other people have done before you, are doing right now, and will still be doing in the future.

You’re joining in an activity that spans the ages and the globe. You’re participating in an experience that is shared by thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of people across time and space.

____

You’re having the same experience now as the George Washingtons, Winston Churchills, Abraham Lincolns, etc. of history had when you read Shakespeare today. You’re having the same experience now as Cicero and Julius Caesar and maybe even the Apostle Paul had when you read Homer.

When you pick up a Jane Austen novel, you’re joining with a whole sea of unseen others who have picked up the same novel. When you read a C.S. Lewis or J.R.R. Tolkein story, you’re living through the same events that many great people have lived through as they read the same book.

____

When you read classic books, therefore, you’re helping to tie history and the world together. You’re participating in the same activities and experiences that many others have. The experience you have, and activity in which you engage, of reading the story is the same as the experience others have had, and the activity in which others have engaged, around the world and through the years.

Furthermore, when you read classic books, you’re becoming part of a tradition. You’re participating in something larger than yourself.

____

And, when you read classic books, you’re enabling yourself to better understand the people who have shaped your world, because (a) you’ve now shared some of their experiences with them (the experience of reading the book you’re reading, and of living through the story with its characters), and (b) you now know the characters and plots and stories that helped them to see the structures in their world and to understand the events in their lives.

The stories we read and hear and watch begin to act as metaphors for the events in our lives. We begin to see our world through the stories we’ve experienced. The stories we’ve lived through help us to see the organization and structure of what we live through in the real world.

There’s an important sense, therefore, in which you cannot understand another person unless you understand the stories they see the world through.

____

So, we read the Classics in order to participate in the connecting of different times and places with each other, in order to participate in a tradition larger than ourselves, and in order to better understand other people (especially those who have helped to shape our world).

But there are other reasons as well.

What do you think?

-Micah Tillman

[Micah is a Mt. Sophia graduate who is working on his doctoral dissertation at The Catholic University of America. He also gets to teach philosophy (as a "teaching fellow"), which he loves.]

Share and Enjoy:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Related posts:

4 Responses to “On the Reading of Old Books”

  1. I agree. One of the great benefits of reading classics is understanding ourselves and our culture. Authors have been shaping the world since Bible times. We participate in that world shaping by knowing the books that shaped us.
    AND…
    Have you ever quoted a book (or a movie) and had someone join in on the quote?

    That is a classic moment. In those moments both participants joined a thought that is larger than themselves.

  2. My definition of good art is art that I do not tire of. Good music I can listen to again and again; good paintings I can look at again and again; good literature I can read again and again.

    The Psalms are good art. In my field of mathematics, the proofs by Leonhard Euler are good art. This is all very subjective: “My definition … I can … my field.” To be a classic, an artistic work must be something that many (most?) people do not tire of, over a long period of time. On this definition, David’s Psalms and Michelangelo’s David, and Bach’s organ works are classic.

    For authors more recent than C. S. Lewis a long period of time has not yet happened. At best I can predict that they are “destined to become a classic.” In our current visual culture, we are more apt to recognize film classics than literary classics. I predict that these are destined to become classics: The Matrix, Babbette’s Feast, and La vita è bella [Life is beautiful].

    What things do you think are destined to become classics?

  3. Well, with film: It’s a Wonderful Life and the absolute greats: Muppets’ Christmas Carol and Treasure Island.

    Modern theologians: Dallas Willard, NT Wright, Richard Foster

    Novels: PG Wodehouse Jeeves and Wooster series

    (The silly stuff is not because it has lasting value in anything but making one laugh:)

  4. I agree on the Matrix, It’s a Wonderful Life, and Life Is Beautiful. I haven’t seen Babbette’s Feast, but I trust Dr. Chase’s taste. And I heartily agree with my mother’s list of theologians.

    As for the fun stuff — Muppets’ Christmas Carol and Treasure Island, PG Wodehouse’s Jeeves and Wooster — I definitely share my mother’s taste. I think they’re absolutely marvelous.

    But comedic pieces are always a problem when discussing Classics. Does a Classic have to be weighty and serious? Is comedy too “light”?

    Then again, some comedies have become Classics. Shakespeare’s come immediately to mind. The Princess Bride seems to me to be standing the test of time extremely well.

    I certainly hope that Wodehouse and the Muppets make it onto the list of Classics (in their particular genres). I think if they do it will be because people will continue to find them “relevant” to their everyday lives (for example, events in their everyday lives will continue to call to mind scenes and quotations from them).

Leave a Reply